<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Brew! Chocolate Stout!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/2008/08/08/new-brew-chocolate-stout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/2008/08/08/new-brew-chocolate-stout/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sickpuppy</title>
		<link>http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/2008/08/08/new-brew-chocolate-stout/#comment-2986</link>
		<dc:creator>sickpuppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/?p=29#comment-2986</guid>
		<description>Hey Bill! Thanks for stopping by! Im not worried about the black patent at all, the chocolate in this beer pretty much overpowers anyting else so far. As far as the partial mash, understood, I just prefer to use my mash tun :) The FG turned out to be 1.022 so its right on target for my malt bill. I will post an actuall update on SIBT soon. Good luck with your ESB!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bill! Thanks for stopping by! Im not worried about the black patent at all, the chocolate in this beer pretty much overpowers anyting else so far. As far as the partial mash, understood, I just prefer to use my mash tun <img src='http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> The FG turned out to be 1.022 so its right on target for my malt bill. I will post an actuall update on SIBT soon. Good luck with your ESB!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madison Bill</title>
		<link>http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/2008/08/08/new-brew-chocolate-stout/#comment-2985</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/?p=29#comment-2985</guid>
		<description>That's a LOT of Black Patent malt!  Hope it doesn't go too bitter on you.  You didn't really have to do a mini-mash with the grains in your recipe .. they are all highly modified (kilned) grains which already have the sugars broken down. A steep would have been just fine. (reference "Mr. Wizard" in BYO magazine) Okay on losing most of your WL Irish Ale yeast .. bummer.  I wouldn't be concerned about the flavor profile, since Safale 05 is neutral (unless you ferment warm, then it gets estery/fruity).  What I *might* be concerned with is the FG.  05 is a beast, and instead of finishing around 1.015-1.020, you may go below 1.010. Yeah, I know that will kick up your ABV, but you could wind up being a bit astringent in the finish.  If that should happen, when your primary is finished and you have a stable FG for 2-3 days, you could do a secondary and throw in some cocoa powder or even lactose (which is unfermentable and will increase sweetness and mouthfeel).  Just a thought ... might turn out perfect just the way it is .. or even get better with a little age on it.  Doesn't look like it will be huge .. with a 1.066 SG, perhaps about 7%.

Can't wait to start my ESB this Labor Day weekend.  Have an Irish ale planned for after that.  Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a LOT of Black Patent malt!  Hope it doesn&#8217;t go too bitter on you.  You didn&#8217;t really have to do a mini-mash with the grains in your recipe .. they are all highly modified (kilned) grains which already have the sugars broken down. A steep would have been just fine. (reference &#8220;Mr. Wizard&#8221; in BYO magazine) Okay on losing most of your WL Irish Ale yeast .. bummer.  I wouldn&#8217;t be concerned about the flavor profile, since Safale 05 is neutral (unless you ferment warm, then it gets estery/fruity).  What I *might* be concerned with is the FG.  05 is a beast, and instead of finishing around 1.015-1.020, you may go below 1.010. Yeah, I know that will kick up your ABV, but you could wind up being a bit astringent in the finish.  If that should happen, when your primary is finished and you have a stable FG for 2-3 days, you could do a secondary and throw in some cocoa powder or even lactose (which is unfermentable and will increase sweetness and mouthfeel).  Just a thought &#8230; might turn out perfect just the way it is .. or even get better with a little age on it.  Doesn&#8217;t look like it will be huge .. with a 1.066 SG, perhaps about 7%.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait to start my ESB this Labor Day weekend.  Have an Irish ale planned for after that.  Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/2008/08/08/new-brew-chocolate-stout/#comment-2838</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/?p=29#comment-2838</guid>
		<description>Thanks for catching that Clarke, I changed the recipe a bit due to my homebrew shop running out of dark DME (I bought the last 3 lbs!)I used only 3 lbs of the dark DME, not 6 like it stated earlier. I ended up with 1.066 which should be right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for catching that Clarke, I changed the recipe a bit due to my homebrew shop running out of dark DME (I bought the last 3 lbs!)I used only 3 lbs of the dark DME, not 6 like it stated earlier. I ended up with 1.066 which should be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cLarKe</title>
		<link>http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/2008/08/08/new-brew-chocolate-stout/#comment-2831</link>
		<dc:creator>cLarKe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/?p=29#comment-2831</guid>
		<description>Hey, are your ingredients right here?  You said you hit 1.069 with this recipe, which was lower than the 1.080 target. But I'm looking now and I see a total of 10 pounds of DME?  That should definitely have gotten you there.  What's up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, are your ingredients right here?  You said you hit 1.069 with this recipe, which was lower than the 1.080 target. But I&#8217;m looking now and I see a total of 10 pounds of DME?  That should definitely have gotten you there.  What&#8217;s up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuBBy</title>
		<link>http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/2008/08/08/new-brew-chocolate-stout/#comment-2805</link>
		<dc:creator>BuBBy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shouldibrewthat.com/beer/?p=29#comment-2805</guid>
		<description>Looks awesome.  I have a Pale Ale in the queue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks awesome.  I have a Pale Ale in the queue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
